Facebook loses appeal to block bulk search warrants in New York

0

New York state’s highest court dealt a blow to Facebook and other social media companies seeking to expand privacy protections Tuesday, ruling that Facebook had no right to appeal bulk search warrants ordering the company to hand over information from hundreds of accounts in a disability fraud case.

The state Court of Appeals, in a 5-1 decision, with one judge recusing himself, upheld lower court rulings that New York law does not allow a social media company to challenge a judge’s decision to issue search warrants in a criminal case on behalf of its clients.

The ruling was a setback for civil libertarians and social media companies hoping the court might create a different rule for search warrants aimed at seizing all the information in electronic accounts, treating them more like subpoenas, which can be challenged as overly broad before they are executed.

But Judge Leslie E. Stein, writing for the majority, said state courts had held for decades that search warrants issued by judges cannot be appealed to a higher court. Instead, they may only be challenged by a defendant during a pretrial hearing as illegal searches.

New York state’s highest court dealt a blow to Facebook and other social media companies seeking to expand privacy protections Tuesday, ruling that Facebook had no right to appeal bulk search warrants ordering the company to hand over information from hundreds of accounts in a disability fraud case.

The state Court of Appeals, in a 5-1 decision, with one judge recusing himself, upheld lower court rulings that New York law does not allow a social media company to challenge a judge’s decision to issue search warrants in a criminal case on behalf of its clients.

The ruling was a setback for civil libertarians and social media companies hoping the court might create a different rule for search warrants aimed at seizing all the information in electronic accounts, treating them more like subpoenas, which can be challenged as overly broad before they are executed.
But Judge Leslie E. Stein, writing for the majority, said state courts had held for decades that search warrants issued by judges cannot be appealed to a higher court.

Instead, they may only be challenged by a defendant during a pretrial hearing as illegal searches.

“Indeed to hold otherwise would be to impermissible and judicially create a right to appeal in a criminal matter that has not been authorized by our legislature,” Stein wrote in her 25-page decision.
She acknowledged that Facebook had presented the court with “novel and important substantive issues regarding the constitutional rights of privacy and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure” but said that the court was “constrained by law” to reject the company’s arguments.

One judge dissented. Judge Rowan D. Wilson argued that the federal law authorizing the warrants — the Stored Communications Act of 1986 — did not distinguish between warrants and subpoenas. In his reading, that statute gives service providers a right to appeal all overly broad court orders, including search warrants.
“State rules of procedures applicable to garden-variety warrants cannot be used as a device to contravene or frustrate federal law,” he wrote.

Wilson noted that the framers of the New York Constitution in 1938 had specifically warned against the evil of the invasion of privacy in electronic communications.

“The New York Constitution commands us to guard vigilantly against that evil,” he said.

The case — known formally as “In Re 381 Search Warrants Directed to Facebook Inc.” — had been closely watched as a test, as Facebook sought to expand its ability to fight what it sees as fishing expeditions by prosecutors. Several tech giants, including Google, LinkedIn and Twitter, filed amicus briefs, as had the New York Civil Liberties Union.
The search warrants were signed in 2013 by Justice Melissa C. Jackson on the strength of a 96-page affidavit that has never been made public.

Facebook moved to quash the warrants, saying they were too broad and objecting to the judge’s order prohibiting the company from telling its clients about them. Jackson denied the motion, saying that Facebook, as a service provider, could not argue the searches were unconstitutional on behalf of its clients. She also said there was enough evidence of fraud to justify the mass warrants.

The warrants ordered Facebook to turn over all of the information in the accounts of 381 people, including private photos and conversations.

That information was used by the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., to obtain indictments for disability fraud against more than 130 police officers and other former public employees. None of the people indicted challenged the search warrants.

Vance personally argued the case before the court, underscoring its importance to his office, which has used private information in Facebook accounts not only to prove the enormous disability fraud scheme but also to make conspiracy cases against hundreds of members of street gangs in housing projects.
Jay Nancarrow, a spokesman for Facebook, said the company had yet to decide whether to take its case to the federal courts.








Aliexpress INT

JOIN MY NEWSLETTER
Join My Newsletter that I'm Going to send out 2-3 Times Every Month, So it will Be no Spamming
I hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Our Rating

0
Reader Rating: (0 Rates)
0

About author

No comments

Instagram

JOIN MY NEWSLETTERJoin My Newsletter that I'm Going to send out 2-3 Times Every Month, So it will Be no SpammingI hate spam. Your email ...
Free WordPress Themes, Free Android Games